🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a solid first step," stated a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily unfolding at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, additional nations are also exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured tone. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve safety.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments around the world are less and less content to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.